Explanation of a magnetic motor principle, which is a combination of Hamel’s principle for magnetic spin and Bhaskara’s en DaVinci’s gravity wheel designs. This magnetic flywheel requires a minimal intelligent impulse to run with speed, and may thus, in harnessing the negative energy, the gravitons of the ether or the zero-point or vaccum energy if you like, lead to overunity devices, UFO-like anti-gravity with higher speeds or even dimensional shifting with superspeeds (time-machine), and thus add to the solution for the world’s energy and transportation problems. Reference is made to the work of Howard Johnson, John Bedini and Tom Bearden. Website: http://theorderoftime.org
Duration : 0:7:37
[youtube Pq2L4QmHYZ0]
Free energy is all …
Free energy is all around us, I just built a Free energy motor and generator from FuellessUSA com pleas take a look at these plans.
Are ypu really …
Are ypu really teaching me something about the workings of the solar system? It works! The planets do not stop spinning… Period.
@anandaadhar – the …
@anandaadhar – the earth moves around the sun causing sun rise and sun sets. However it is not perpetual motion. As the frequency of sun sets relies on the speed of rotation of the earth they take longer each year as the earth slows down. Understand?
No one has found over-unity or how to control it. People currently sell over-unity in one form or another to the gullible public. They sell it but never deliver it.
I see the sun …
I see the sun setting and rising out of its own, don’t you? Thus it is perpetual motion. And yes, I never meant anything else but conversion of space energy talking about overunity. As soon as conversion happens, we speak of surplus energy or overunity. Read the article at my site on free energy history and all the people testifying about overunity systems and the problems they had with them. Often they found effects of overunity, but the control of them and thus commerce is always the problem.
@anandaadhar – …
@anandaadhar – nature is not perpetual motion as energy is not created out of nothing. Converting radiant energy into kinetic energy is not free energy, merely conversion.
Regardless of the tales surrounding Tesla no one has gotten free energy systems to work under any circumstances. The reason is simple. Reality says it can’t happen.
Nature itself is …
Nature itself is perpetual motion. All we have to do is link up to it….this we call sustainable energy policies. But to sense and process time directly is indeed the proof we are after. Tesla drove the first electric car without batteries… was it free energy, could he convert radiant energy into kinetic energy with an electrical system? He proved it, but we didn’t believe it. He was accused of black magic and his lab was burnt down and J.P. Morgan made sure that a second Tesla could not be.
Over-unity is …
Over-unity is impossible. Millions believe otherwise. Proof that millions are wrong.
thats a cool idea i …
thats a cool idea i would like to see it run
I understand the …
I understand the basic idea, but it has nothing to do with gravitons
The wheel locks because the numbers aren’t right.
Iron magnets are weak. You ought to use Neodimium-rare earth magnets if you want any success. I suggest N35+! $8 a piece each 1/4″ thick, and 1″ in diameter.
You won’t get the …
You won’t get the sobriety award!.
Dude,
Take a …
Dude,
Take a physics class, get your vocabulary right and then you will understand why this cannot work.
As I said , there …
As I said , there is not one science. We have to respect each other’s position of science to be different. In fact we are looking for new science perpectives when we experiment like me e.g. with this wheel. Without arrogance and calling each other ignorant there is closure in discussions, not otherwise. No respect is no peace. Your problem apparently. I cannot subscribe to your insults of being ignorant of course.
You apparently do …
You apparently do not understand, or do not want to understand, what I try to tell you.
I suggest you dream on but do not confuse what you do with science. You have no idea what science is.
That does not make you a bad person but I have no wish to argue metaphysics with you (because it’s boring compared to the real thing) so lets end this.
Let me know if you ever get a Free Energy Magnet Motor working. I promise to take you seriously then.
Peace brother.
Think. What you …
Think. What you call science is the science you do. Apparently there is more than one option of science. They call it a paradigm, not just a theory. One paradagm harbours many theories. Ever heard of it? Paradigms change. Read Thomas Kuhn. Paradigms change definitons too. For instance what is the center of the universe? What is gravity and what is energy or an energy source? What is work? Your certainty of science is all false. In fact the uncerainty principle rules in this corner of science.
The concept of …
The concept of energy is very well defined in scientific terms and used in physics, chemistry, astronomy, engineering etc.
You obviously have your own definition, or idea, of something you call “energy” and that’s great, but do not confuse it with the definition used in science.
And you must understand the difference between scientific theories, that do change, and definitions, that never change because they are just definitions used to describe phenomena and test the scientific theories.
You think there is …
You think there is only one way to think about it. You talk about energy from matter, I talk about energy from space, the active expansion of it as the basis for all overunity. This is a quest. So join me or stay behind. Science has never been a one way street and never will. If something like this works we have redefined the concept of energy indeed. Why else would we be talking/discussing about it? To kiss your dogmatic lazy behind? i don’t think so.
“without movement …
“without movement there is no energy”.
That is plainly wrong. You do not understand the concept of energy. Energy can be stored and used later. You seem to think that energy exist only when it is used (or, more correct, converted to other forms).
PS.
Funny how you accuse people of being arrogant when you say that all (all!) books on physics is wrong but you are right about this. That’s true arrogance.
To all respondents, …
To all respondents, I will delete all posts that are insulting using the wrong words. First deserve it to be addressed behaving respectfully.
So relativism …
So relativism saying no can do is real sciene? That is doubted by many. Quantum theory is a well established approach Einstein indeed didn’t like. Tesla himself didn’t like Einstein’s mathematical mysticism. But you adhere to it being lazy not doing anything yourself. Don’t say that your preference is the absolute truth. No one will accept that. You believe in your inability to make it work, but I do not. So now we have an atheist builing a on a belief? Come on think man! It’s so arrogant.
By moving the …
By moving the magnet in and out of the field, you are doing work on the wheel.
Work = force x distance
Simple kinematics explains that this is a scam. The distortions in spacetime you describe are too small to matter and the existence of quantum foam is doubtful because it violates special relativity. Please, stop debauching science with your crap and learn how physics actually works. Saying the words “quantum theory” doesn’t automatically make you smart.
Simple logic says …
Simple logic says that without time there is no movement, without movement there is no energy or energy conversion as we try here from space energy to kinetic energy. Study Faraday, or sun particles, fotons on the move to power solar cells, or a dam to power hydro electric plant etc etc. Time is fundamental to each concept of energy, this is basic logic. If you can’t find it in the physics textbook, that only means that those writers all need to follow a refresher course in philosophy and logic.
Listen, quantum …
Listen, quantum theory defends space as a form of energy called quantum foam. This all is abput catching that enegry and converting it. No laws are broken, just another paradigm. Heisenberg, the nobel prize winner believed in magnetmotors. So that’s why I do this. Without this backing I certainly woudn’t..
Standard physics …
Standard physics also says that you can neither create nor destroy energy, but only convert energy and matter between each other. Your proposal violates the laws of physics.
That is why I do …
That is why I do not load anymore of my failed attempts. Happy?
talk , talk , talk …
talk , talk , talk ………bla bla bla let use see the wheel spin freely then.